5.6.3. Analytical problems concerning the types of reference
A jegyzet hozzáadásához kérjük, lépj be!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő formátumot:
| Harvard: | Jenei Gabriella (2024): Referential Cohesion in Academic Writing. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640491Letöltve: https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1211rciaw_69_p1/#m1211rciaw_69_p1 (2026. 08. 09.)
| |
| Chicago: | Jenei Gabriella. 2024. Referential Cohesion in Academic Writing. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640491(Letöltve: 2026. 08. 09.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1211rciaw_69_p1/#m1211rciaw_69_p1) | |
| APA: | Jenei G. (2024). Referential Cohesion in Academic Writing. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640491. (Letöltve: 2026. 08. 09.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1211rciaw_69_p1/#m1211rciaw_69_p1) |
When viewing each type of tie where coders’ opinions differed, the numbers in the previous section (5.6.2) will make more sense. This section summarizes instances of problematic items, the reasons why they might be problematic and the analytical decisions that had to be made during the analyses. The problems are collected from the think-aloud procedure and the intra- and inter-coder differences.