6.4.5. The intermediate procedure

A jegyzet hozzáadásához kérjük, lépj be!

Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő formátumot:
Harvard:
Bérces Viktor (2024): Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. : Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477Letöltve: https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p1/#m1199eicp_76_p1 (2026. 08. 11.)
Chicago:
Bérces Viktor. 2024. Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. : Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477(Letöltve: 2026. 08. 11.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p1/#m1199eicp_76_p1)
APA:
Bérces V. (2024). Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477. (Letöltve: 2026. 08. 11.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p1/#m1199eicp_76_p1)
BibTeXEndNoteMendeleyZotero
The function of the interlocutory proceedings is to ensure that the competent court is satisfied that the suspicions are well-founded or that the charge is appropriate. The procedure is as follows:

A jegyzet hozzáadásához kérjük, lépj be!

Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő formátumot:
Harvard:
Bérces Viktor (2024): Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. : Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477Letöltve: https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p2/#m1199eicp_76_p2 (2026. 08. 11.)
Chicago:
Bérces Viktor. 2024. Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. : Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477(Letöltve: 2026. 08. 11.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p2/#m1199eicp_76_p2)
APA:
Bérces V. (2024). Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636640477. (Letöltve: 2026. 08. 11.https://uat.mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1199eicp_76_p2/#m1199eicp_76_p2)
BibTeXEndNoteMendeleyZotero
  • the prosecutor submits the indictment to the court with jurisdiction (indictment)1 and requests the accused to state any evidence or objections within the prescribed time limit; 2
  • in the case of a mandatory defence, the president must appoint a defence counsel for a defendant who does not have an authorised defence counsel;
  • the court decides on the motions and objections raised by the accused;
  • the court may order an individual taking of evidence in order to clarify the facts more thoroughly, against whose decision there is no right of appeal;
  • the court decides in closed session to open or close the court proceedings.3
1The accused shall be deemed to have been charged from that date.
2The right of defence is therefore already given at this stage of the procedure.
3Herke (2011) ibid. 40.
Menü